Re: [SG/DS] Unit Size Definitions

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:06:33 +0100 "Germ" <germ@germy.co.uk> writes:
>> Yeah.
>> If you Brits had a consistent system, then that would
>> be an acceptable way of phrasing it.  But with the
>> changes in your structure, plus the names vs. numbers
>> issue, amalgamations (no US unit has ever been saddled
>> with a designation like "17/21st Lancers"), plus
>> stupidities like every Brit Royal Artillery battalion
>> being part of the same regiment while most infantry
>> units are single-bat, etc, etc, etc it's safe to say
>> "The Brits have to be different".
>> John
>
>Consistency is boring. We're not being different, we're
>just adding character :)
>
>Jeremey
>germ@germy.co.uk
>www.germy.co.uk
>

I think you left the "s" off characters.

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit: