Re: SG/DS Orbital Insertion
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 18:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: SG/DS Orbital Insertion
--- Randall Joiner <rljoiner@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > > command thinks/believes it's not, it's not
> unlikely
> > > that they're wrong, and
> > > even a "cold" zone could have hidden assets,
> > > snipers, etc.
> >
> >Snipers cannot shoot down landers.
> >
>
> Says who?
Presuming your landers are armored, physics.
> Seems to me that one of the laws of warfare (and
> ironically science as
> well) I picked up over the years can be boiled down
> to:
> "Inconceivable!"
> "I do not think that word means what you think it
> means..."
Dadum-ching!
This is now the second Princess Bride reference in the
past 30 days. . .
John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup