Re: QUESTION FOR OERJAN

DAWGFACE wrote:

>OERJAN,  exactly wot do you mean by defining which SG II scenario i am
>talking about?

I was referring mainly to the post "HARKEN", where you started talking 
about your second least favourite politico... without any hints whatever
of 
how to use this piece of "background information" in a GZG-game
scenario.

>i was not aware that SG II had gone the  route of the newer versions of
>40K with a set number of specific, offici, gaming  scenarios to be
gamed
>to the point of barfing from boredom.

It hasn't. You can make up pretty much any scenario you want for any of
the 
GZG games. A "scenario" is any set of background/situation + terrain
sketch 
+ forces involved, BTW - it doesn't have to be part of an official 
"scenario list"... unless of course you believe every word GW publishes.

FWIW, I don't believe every word GW publishes.

The fact that the GZG games don't have specified lists of scenarios
means 
that you need to provide quite a lot of detail about the scenario you
have 
in mind - it isn't enough to just say "Ambush" or "Dawn Patrol" like it 
would be in WH40K.

However, you didn't give ANY details of any potential scenario - not
even 
the single word which would've been sufficient in WH40K.

Regards,

Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."