Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 02:35:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [OT] French was: [SG]Artillery
At 6:41 PM -0700 5/27/02, John Atkinson wrote:
>
>2 weeks less than did the defenses of Poland, a
>country surrounded on every side but the north, with
>an army less than a quarter the size of the French
>one, with no medium or heavy tanks, a tiny and
>outdated airforce, and the Russians invading from the
>East.
Poland also didn't have an ally with expeditionary forces in country
to help stem the tide of enemy advances.
>Of course, the Poles had fighting spirit and that
>counts for much more than heavy tanks and static
>fortresses.
Well, had the poles had the heavy tanks and static fortresses on one
of the fronts, they'd probably have really made the russians and
germans hurt far more than they did.
--
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@mindspring.com
| |
| O--=- | | |
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ |
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\|
_w/^=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__]
|~|\ /|~| |~|/BSV 575\|~|
|~|=\______/=|~| |~|=|_____|=|~|
|~| |~| |~| |~|