Re: Harpoon Fighters

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 04:40:07PM -0700, John Atkinson 
wrote: 
>This discussion has massively tended in the direction
>of Harpoon-style rules covering massive complexity in
>fighters.  

Except for the sub-thread on different fighter types, this hasn't been
(mostly) my impression of the suggested ideas for addressing the
fighter imbalance. Most of the ideas, taken singly, are reasonably
simple. 

Combining too many of them could result in an overcomplex mess, yes.

Time to collect them, assess them and do some playtest of the more
promising ones ?

Greetings