Prev: RE: [FT] back to fighters Next: Re: [FT] back to fighters

Re: [FT] back to fighters

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 13:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [FT] back to fighters


--- Roger Books <books@jumpspace.net> wrote:

> That post you replied to so snippily, you might want
> to compare the author of the post to the name on the
> > > cover of your copy of FB1.
> Then think about who has the final say about PSB and
> the official rules.  
-------
Realistically speaking, even Jon has limits to the 
PSB that he can use, if Jon moves to absurd PSB, 
that will limit the number of sales because 
no reasonable person will accept the concepts.

>Unofficialy of course you can say fighters move 72"
and and hit kills a ship.
-------
This moves us back to soap bubble carriers and the
inability of some players to deal with the this type
of problem when presented by 'junior' players.

Bye for now,
John L.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience


Prev: RE: [FT] back to fighters Next: Re: [FT] back to fighters