Re: Fighters options please
From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:59:58 -0400
Subject: Re: Fighters options please
At 8:56 PM +0100 5/9/02, Roger Burton West wrote:
>On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 12:40:19PM -0700, Brian Bilderback wrote:
>>If the attack
>>misses, the fighter does not expend it's attack, unless the roll was a
1,
>>in which case no damage is done AND the fighters must still return to
>>reload.
>
>Problem with that last bit: does this mean that we have to keep track
of
>which fighters have expended their attacks and which haven't? One of
the
>great virtues of the fighter system is that a group has only the
>following characteristics:
>
>(1) type
>(2) location
>(3) screening status
>(4) number remaining
>(5) CEF remaining
What happened to Torpedo Fighters having one shot? You could turn the
CEF marker upside down when they've expended their attacks.
--
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@SPAmindspring.com '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill '72 Honda CB750 -
- '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
- '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
- I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Smart ID cards in the US, Smart ID cards in Hong Kong, -
- what is the difference? -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- C&R-FFL / Protect your electronic rights! \ EFF-ACLU -
- SAF & NRA/ Join the EFF! http://www.eff.org/ \ DoD #0780 -