Prev: RE: Fighters options please Next: Re: Fighters options please

Re: Fighters options please

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:59:58 -0400
Subject: Re: Fighters options please

At 8:56 PM +0100 5/9/02, Roger Burton West wrote:
>On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 12:40:19PM -0700, Brian Bilderback wrote:
>>If the attack
>>misses, the fighter does not expend it's attack, unless the roll was a
1,
>>in which case no damage is done AND the fighters must still return to
>>reload.
>
>Problem with that last bit: does this mean that we have to keep track
of
>which fighters have expended their attacks and which haven't? One of
the
>great virtues of the fighter system is that a group has only the
>following characteristics:
>
>(1) type
>(2) location
>(3) screening status
>(4) number remaining
>(5) CEF remaining

What happened to Torpedo Fighters having one shot? You could turn the 
CEF marker upside down when they've expended their attacks.

-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill			     '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@SPAmindspring.com			    '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com		 '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       '72 Honda CB750 -
-				      '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
-				   '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-    Smart ID cards in the US, Smart ID cards in Hong Kong,    -
-		      what is the difference?		       - 
----------------------------------------------------------------
-  C&R-FFL  /  Protect your electronic rights!	  \ EFF-ACLU   -
- SAF & NRA/  Join the EFF!  http://www.eff.org/   \ DoD #0780 -	 

Prev: RE: Fighters options please Next: Re: Fighters options please