Prev: RE: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument! Next: RE: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument!

Re: Fighters options please

From: Charles Taylor <nerik@m...>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 18:43:08 +0100
Subject: Re: Fighters options please

In message <F79cM3oryKFRJrzdDW60000de60@hotmail.com>
	  "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Laserlight
> 
> > > 5. shoot whoever started the thread.
> >
> >I don't recall #5 but if so, take a number.	There's a long line
ahead
> >of you.  Don't expect your turn until at least GZGECC VII.
> 
> Given that I'm on the West Coast, Going to ECC will guarantee you NO
shot at 
> me.
> 
> Ironic, though.  Everyone was grumpy about how Off-Topic the list was 
> getting.  I actually bring up a question that initiates the
longest-running 
> ON-topic thread we've had in ages, and I get criticized for it.  Makes
me 
> wonder if I should bother posting at all.
> 
> 3B^2
> 
No, keep posting, this has been interesting!

Charles


Prev: RE: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument! Next: RE: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument!