Prev: Re: Thougth's on Fighters and PDAF... Next: RE: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument!

RE: Re: Fighters options please

From: "laserlight@q..." <laserlight@quixnet.net>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 11:51:14 -0400
Subject: RE: Re: Fighters options please

> From: Robertson, Brendan

> > 5. shoot whoever started the thread.

I said: 
> I don't recall #5 but if so, take a number.  There's a long line ahead
> of you.  Don't expect your turn until at least GZGECC VII.

Roger Books said:
>Is there any way I can argue for clemency?  All I said was
some think fighters are too powerful.

Was it you?  I thought *I* started it, that's why I said there was a
long line.  Your line is a lot shorter.....***BANG!***

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at


Prev: Re: Thougth's on Fighters and PDAF... Next: RE: Re: [FT] Fighters, - this time its not the balance argument!