Re: Fighters options please
From: "Eric Foley" <stiltman@t...>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 23:14:43 -0700
Subject: Re: Fighters options please
Well, all I was suggesting was the 40% hard limit on amount of hull
space
that's permissible to be devoted to fighters. _Maybe_ reduce heavy
fighters' bonus against scatterguns from a straight "half kills" to a
simple
"-1 kills per die". Although if you had the 40% rule, the other
probably
wouldn't be necessary.
This would do little more than get rid of the "soap bubble" problem...
which, I agree, stretches the system to a degree that some might
consider it
broken. If you don't adopt the 40% rule, though, the scattergun
adjustment
pretty much has to be adopted, IMO.
E
(aka Stilt Man)
----- Original Message -----
From: <Beth.Fulton@csiro.au>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:11 PM
Subject: Fighters options please
> G'day guys,
>
> > All of the methods you folks are proposing would emasculate
carriers.
>
> I've been way busy at work so haven't been able to keep up with the
thread,
> could somebody please list the various alternatives thrown out so I
can
try
> them out and see if Ryan's comment holds out (after two weeks of
deciphering
> someone else's undocumented/unreadable c I feel a BIG gaming session
coming
> on...)
>
> Thanks
>