Re: FB designs & fighters
From: Roger Books <books@j...>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 15:43:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: FB designs & fighters
Allan Goodall <agoodall@att.net> wrote:
> The problem, to get back to the essential issue, is the costing of
> fighters. As we have shown, FB1 ships are well balanced against each
> other,
I will point out this is not quite true. A large ship will generally
beat an equivalent point value of smaller ships. That was the
issue that (FB^2?) was taking advantage of when he accepted my
challange of showing the game is broken for non-fighter based
ships. He didn't go quite big enough and designed a ship
extremely vulnerable to SMs even with 21 PDSes.