Re: Its Doctrine, Scouting and Tactics not Fighters

>From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com>

>At 9:35 AM -0700 5/6/02, Brian Bilderback wrote:
>>I'm amazed.  The world is ending.  Ryan and I see eye to eye.
>
>:-P
>We were agreeing over the weekend too you know...

Yeah, but I wasn't online then, so it doesn't count. ;-)

>Again, it really seems to me that what is lacking is a cohesive
>Morale effect for task groups as well as newer sensor and fleet
>tactics rules. Carriers just don't launch strikes from visual range.
>They launch a strike that has been planned due to intel indicating a
>force is over there somewhere, beyond passive sensor range.

Which is one of the reasons I like campaign games better than one-offs, 
since you can concoct campaign rules to cover such contingencies.

>I've had a plan to sit down and make up something then play test it,

This is now your sacred duty. Thus Spake Me.

>but a combination of the death of my mother,

My condolences.  I lost my father last summer, I know the feeling.

inheriting her house,

Kind of a mixed blessing, isn't it?

>purchasing two armored cars, playing in a good AD&D campaign again
>and getting involved with a cute goth chic

Lucky Bastard^3

has pretty much nixed the
>chances of that getting done.
>
>So do any of you single folks that don't have 10 pans on the stove
>want to give it a shot?

Ummm... anyone with fewer than 10 pans is not a gamer and would be of no
use 
for such a project. ;-)

2B^2

_________________________________________________________________