Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 08:59:28 -0400
Subject: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity
At 9:55 AM +0100 5/3/02, Roger Burton West wrote:
>
>In general, what seems to happen is:
>
> I bring: normal weapons PDS+ADFC fighters
>Enemy brings:
>normal weapons even fight I lose I win
>PDS+ADFC I win even fight even fight
>fighters I lose even fight even fight
This is correct. Can you read the account of the battle of Savo
Island? This is an exact account of PDS+ADFC vs normal weapons. I
have to ask though, if you have a BDN that is optimized with PDS vs
more small anti-ship weapons, why are you getting into knife fighting
range? Stand off.
>Which means that, if I want to increase my odds of winning, I should
>always bring fighter-heavy fleets. Certainly, on the few occasions I've
>seem munchkins playing FT, fighters are what they've always gone for.
Also, in the case of a task group that is not equipped to fight a
given opponent, if they don't have to fight, why don't they just
refuse battle and withdraw? I know it's not fun, but it does make
sense...
--
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@mindspring.com
| |
| O--=- | | |
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ |
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\|
_w/^=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__]
|~|\ /|~| |~|/BSV 575\|~|
|~|=\______/=|~| |~|=|_____|=|~|
|~| |~| |~| |~|