Prev: [GZG AARs] Scenarios or games with a twist or smile Next: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

From: Roger Books <books@j...>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 00:06:38 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

Take the owner of the glass carrier out back and work him
over with a rubber hose?  :)

Guys?  Hey, I was just kidding, really.

Roger Books

On 30-Apr-02 at 22:28, Laserlight (laserlight@quixnet.net) wrote:
> > On 4/30/02 1:40 PM, "Roger Books" <books@jumpspace.net> wrote:
> >
> > > That brings up another common discussion.
> 
> The value of fighters goes up in a non-linear way, ie the value of N
> squadrons is much greater than (N * value of 1 squadron).  This is why
> it is very difficult to balance.  Rules that work well for, say, a
> 3000pt fleet including 3 squadrons, don't work at all when the other
> side shows up with glass carriers holding 30 squadrons.
> 
> This was a recent topic of discussion on the test list; a solution was
> proposed but not extensively tested yet, so at the moment it's
> unsolved.  So...how would you, O Wise Ones Of The List, deal with
> this?
> 


Prev: [GZG AARs] Scenarios or games with a twist or smile Next: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity