Prev: Re: This is _so_ not appreciated (was Re: AMERICA, RIGHT OR WRONG?) Next: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

From: "Laserlight" <laserlight@q...>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:24:47 -0400
Subject: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

> On 4/30/02 1:40 PM, "Roger Books" <books@jumpspace.net> wrote:
>
> > That brings up another common discussion.

The value of fighters goes up in a non-linear way, ie the value of N
squadrons is much greater than (N * value of 1 squadron).  This is why
it is very difficult to balance.  Rules that work well for, say, a
3000pt fleet including 3 squadrons, don't work at all when the other
side shows up with glass carriers holding 30 squadrons.

This was a recent topic of discussion on the test list; a solution was
proposed but not extensively tested yet, so at the moment it's
unsolved.  So...how would you, O Wise Ones Of The List, deal with
this?


Prev: Re: This is _so_ not appreciated (was Re: AMERICA, RIGHT OR WRONG?) Next: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity