Prev: Re: AMERICA, RIGHT OR WRONG? Next: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@p...>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:03:11 -0700
Subject: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

On 4/30/02 1:40 PM, "Roger Books" <books@jumpspace.net> wrote:

> That brings up another common discussion.

[snip]

My personal view is that fighters are just about right as they stand
(meaning that roughly an equal number of player complain that they are
too
weak/powerful ;-).

While I like the idea of Hangars and Launch Tubes, they would need to be
implemented in such a way so as to not affect balance much. That's the
challenge.

Prev: Re: AMERICA, RIGHT OR WRONG? Next: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity