Prev: Re: in search of: DSII pics of.... Next: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

From: Roger Books <books@j...>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:40:03 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity

On 30-Apr-02 at 15:56, Brian Bilderback (bbilderback@hotmail.com) wrote:
> Roger Books wrote:
> >This is another "discussed to death" topic.
> 
> Sorry if I'm rehashing an old subject, but this was probably beofre I
was 
> into FT.  Just asking.

Nothing to be sorry about.  My intention was to let you know there
was much discussion in the archives, not to chastise anyone.

> >The consensus, as far as I remember, was that it made
> >fighters much cheaper and therefore much stronger.
> 
> Not a bad thing if that's how you want them in the game setting you
run.
> :-) 

That brings up another common discussion.

1. Fighters are too powerful (usually those that don't use morale)

2. Fighters are close to correct in value.

(The phrasing shows my bias)

I don't think I've heard anyone say fighters in large numbers,
4+ squadrons, are too weak.

Prev: Re: in search of: DSII pics of.... Next: Re: FT: Carriers & Fighter Capacity