RE: RE: [SG2] close combat
From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:00:34 -0700
Subject: RE: RE: [SG2] close combat
IIRC, everyone, both sides, all states (functional, wounded, dead)
Michael Brown
-----Original Message-----
From: laserlight@quixnet.net
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:40 AM
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: RE: [SG2] close combat
>Bell, Brian
>Take a look at Tomb's Cose Combat Extentions:
>The 'Making Numbers Count' rule shifts the side outnumbered down 1 if
the
odds are 2:1 and down 2 if 3:1 or greater.
Yep, that just happens to be one of the few House Rules from
Stargrunt.ca that
I'm not quite 100% happy with, even though it's reasonable. I'm just
offering
an alternate.
In a related vein, Roger Burton West and I are in a PBEM of SG and a
situation
has arisen for which I'm wondering what the consensus is (won't affect
our game
as Roger and I have already agreed on how to treat it). A
Red-nationality
squad close assaulted a Blue-nationality squad. Both sides took
casualties;
the Blues failed a confidence check and withdrew, and the Reds elected
not to
pursue. The Red position now has 3 operational Reds, 2 dead or wounded
Reds,
and 3 dead or wounded Blues. A nearby Blue squad, showing ruthless
unconcern
about hitting their wounded, opens fire and does three hits.
Who is eligible to get hit? The 3 functional Reds, or all the
functional and
wounded, or fuctional/wounded/dead, or something else?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at