Prev: Re: [OFFICIAL] Online catalogue..... Next: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps

RE: Nukes

From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 06:57:41 -0700
Subject: RE: Nukes

Too bad they only show relatively large weapons. Would be more
interesting to 
see 10-50 KT.

Michael Brown

-----Original Message-----
From:	Warren Shultzaberger
Sent:	Friday, April 19, 2002 4:04 AM
To:	gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject:	RE: Nukes

Thomas Barclay Wrote:
>

<SNIP>

> the Russians had lost track of (ie walked away on
> their own) about 80 Nuclear Demolitions
> Munitions (suitcase nuke).

<another snip>

>
> Things are probably better of late, but there
> are a lot of missing (well, they might be
> missing, but if you'd seen Russian paperwork,
> it'd apparently be hard to tell) weapons (N B
> and C) and some missing brainiacs too.
>
> Enough to give you the willies, if you really think
> about it. Especially with Saddam, the Iranian
> guys, and the likes of Al-Queda looking for their
> services.....
>

Gee... Thanks...

I've been trained in NBC Warfare and the stuff I know gives me the
willies in the middle of the night.

Gives new meaning to the web site -
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/bomb/sfeature/blastmap.html

Warren Shultzaberger


Prev: Re: [OFFICIAL] Online catalogue..... Next: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps