Prev: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps Next: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps

Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:44:23 -0400
Subject: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps

At 4:57 PM -0400 4/18/02, Roger Books wrote:
>
>You don't think the big laser they are proposing for knocking
>down intermediate range missiles would take down an airplane?
>They are mounting the thing in a big jet.

I don't see the laser being something usable for the next 40 years on 
a light platform like a blimp. However, as an AEW platform, a blimp 
all the way up to a rigid airship will have an extremely valuable 
performance envelope with regards to station time over a given task 
group.
-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill			     '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@mindspring.com 			    '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@turner.com			 '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       '72 Honda CB750 -
-				      '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
-				   '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-    Smart ID cards in the US, Smart ID cards in Hong Kong,    -
-		      what is the difference?		       - 
----------------------------------------------------------------
-  C&R-FFL  /  Protect your electronic rights!	  \ EFF-ACLU   -
- SAF & NRA/  Join the EFF!  http://www.eff.org/   \ DoD #0780 -	 

Prev: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps Next: Re: Slow planes was: Battle blimps