Prev: Re: Battle blimps Next: Book recommendation was Re: Battle blimps

Re: Battle blimps

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:49:46 -0400
Subject: Re: Battle blimps

At 12:54 PM -0700 4/16/02, Brian Burger wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Michael Llaneza wrote:
>
>>  I smell a Harpoon scenario there.
>
>No, you just caught a whiff of whatever the PopMech editors smoke when
>they write these articles! :>
>
>I think they used the phrase 'laser cannons' at least five times... I
know
>there are serious proposals for bringing back the rigid airship in
various
>forms, including military, but PM is getting pretty goofy.

Considering the Laser that is on the ABL takes up the better part of 
a 747, I don't see this stuff being fitted to a blimp or semi-rigid 
any time soon.

>
>That said, I like rigid airships, they're cool, and more power to the
>ideas of bringing them back! Zepplin AGM in Germany is also back in the
>zepplin business; I think they've got their 2nd zep flying now

Is this the Zepplin NT that was bandied about a few years back?

I personally think Admiral Moffet had some good ideas as far as 
Airships and Fleet operations went. Things just didn't pan out very 
well for them operationally.

-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill			     '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@mindspring.com 			    '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@turner.com			 '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       '72 Honda CB750 -
-				      '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
-				   '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-    Smart ID cards in the US, Smart ID cards in Hong Kong,    -
-		      what is the difference?		       - 
----------------------------------------------------------------
-  C&R-FFL  /  Protect your electronic rights!	  \ EFF-ACLU   -
- SAF & NRA/  Join the EFF!  http://www.eff.org/   \ DoD #0780 -	 

Prev: Re: Battle blimps Next: Book recommendation was Re: Battle blimps