RE: GEV RVs
From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 22:40:10 -0700
Subject: RE: GEV RVs
To give an example of how soil can effect the charge, we tried to use a
shape
charge to "dig" our hole for a cratering charge in the Mojave (FT
Irwin). Blew
a nice clean hole @ 2' in diameter, the cratering charge is @ 6" in
diameter.
The "book" said it should work.
Michael Brown
-----Original Message-----
From: John Atkinson
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 5:02 PM
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: GEV RVs
--- Laserlight <laserlight@quixnet.net> wrote:
> > Well, for a tank it'd be a two-stage problem.
> First
> > holes, which needs shaped charges.
>
> Thermite grenade? IIRC the US troops in winter 1944
> dug foxholes in
Not foxholes for tanks.
A hasty fighting position for an M1 tank should be 32'
long, 18' wide, and 9' deep. This is a non-trivial
problem.
4 holes, 60lbs of explosive each. Holes would be dug
with 40lb shaped charges (48" standoff produces a 7'
hole 14.5" diameter). That's a modification of the
setup for a deliberate road crater, with the holes
evened out to level the bottom of the crater. That's
400lbs plus priming.
As near as I can tell, that'll still be a bit narrow
and might need some fine-tuning with a bit more bang.
Oh, and the sides will be a bit steep for the tanks to
roll in and out. Maybe another one or two hundred lbs
for fine-tuning.
That's a rough estimate, and would be thrown off by
the quality of the soil and other environmental
factors. Permafrost would mean you'd need at least
twice the amount of explosives.
I wouldn't want to do it in combat without verifying
some of my guesses.
John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax