Re: KNOCKING THE ARMY
From: DAWGFACE47@w...
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 10:27:32 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: KNOCKING THE ARMY
WELL, NOW.
i never called the cav (which is a fight unit) REMF, but the cav has its
share of REMF. last i knew, the nmbers crunched out at about 1
fighting soldier per 9 support troops in US ARMY DIVISIONS of all types.
LORDS above, now you are gonna tell me that the cav is free of
politics and useless brass too!
as for the beret, my friend, so the tankers and etc wore them in
germany.
so?
and the cav wears that totally useless and silly looking cowbow hat and
rides horse in parades too.
looks nice, helps build a sense of uniqueness within a unit, BUT, it
does not signify the same thing that being a RANGER, SPECIAL FORCES,
or AIRBORNE soldier.
there is no way that being in an armored unit, or cavalry unit, leg
infantry, artillery or etc, can even begin to compare with the speciaist
RANGER SCHOOL, or SPECIAL FORCE SCHOOL, or AIRBORNE SCHOOL even in the
new and most wonderful yet version of THE GREEN MACHINE!
in the past the RANGER FLASH meant more than it apparently does now,
just as the AIRBORNE and SPECIAL FORCES insignia did.
yes-i would bet my last dollar that you have politics in every arm ,
branch or corps of the US ARMY, as well as useless BRASS, and REMF up
the gazoo.
and let us not forget those ever wonderful assholes catgorized as
civilians accompaning the military in the field either.
or those mobs of DOD civilians who have their own politics and versions
of BRASS as well.
and civilian political appointees.
and in the rest of the ARMED FORCES too.
OUR ARMED FORCES and everyone else's has these folks too.
the result is that those at the wet and nasty end of the action often
pay for the oversights, undersights, and etc.
and if you want to tell me that there is not a feeling of we can do
without special forces troops amongst the herd, LOL, you are deluding
yourself!
DAWGIE