Re: [OT]: 6mm American Civil War???

On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:25:34 -0500, "David
Reeves"<davidar@nortelnetworks.com>
wrote:

>I'm not dead set on 6mm -- I was only thinking about table space and
the
>size battles we wanna do.  I used to own 15mm ACW, but the table was
always
>too small.  10mm appears worth investigating.

10mm has the advantage of being much better in detail than 6mm while
still
being small enough for a small table. I just thought I'd mention it,
though. I
thought of 10mm myself, but I'm leaning towards 6mm.

>I saw Hardtack, your SG2 ACW rules, on your site but the link is not
yet
>active.  would you mind emailing me a softcopy version (if it's
convenient).
>we would like to check it out.

If you can wait a little bit, I'll put that on my list of next projects
for my
web site. It should be up in a week or so. Otherwise, I can e-mail you a
copy
in Word 97 format right now (when it's on the web I'll have it as a Word
doc
and a PDF... maybe a Palm OS doc file, too; I'm not sure an HTML version
would
be all that useful).

I need folks to playtest it. I gave it out to a number of people last
year,
but this version has undergone a substantial re-write. Some of the
formation
stuff is simpler, and I've added better artillery rules. Artillery was a
real
bear. The basic rules include round shot and canister, while the
advanced
rules include case shot and spherical case shot.

If you can wait, I'll post a message to the list when it's up.
Otherwise, I'll
e-mail you the Word file.

Allan Goodall		       agoodall@hyperbear.com
http://www.hyperbear.com

"At long last, the earthy soil of the typical, 
unimaginable mortician was revealed!"