Prev: Re: [ARCHIVES] Overhaul complete Next: RE: [OT]Road Warrior

RE: BULL****, was RE: [SG] HAMR

From: "Bob Makowsky" <rmakowsky@y...>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 06:33:28 -0400
Subject: RE: BULL****, was RE: [SG] HAMR

Karl,

Thank you for the reply as well.

Sometimes humor can be taken too far and I apologize for doing so.

To turn this towards a topical posting...

Does carrying the HAMR give the same penalties to movement that a SAW
does?
(SG book enroute to CT, me stuck in PR).
I would assume it does being an oversized weapon.

Thanks again,

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of K.H.Ranitzsch
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:37 AM
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: BULLSHIT, was RE: [SG] HAMR

Indeed.

I too, try to be civilized when dealing with people who don't know
something. And I found John's reaction to be exaggerated in tone, though
right on the spot about facts.

Oh, and I thought your joke about belt buckles being valid "material"
targets was in extremely bad taste. That wasn't ignorance on your part.
I
thought it was callous - even if intended as a joke.

Greetings
Karl Heinz

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?


Prev: Re: [ARCHIVES] Overhaul complete Next: RE: [OT]Road Warrior