Prev: BULLSHIT, was RE: [SG] HAMR Next: Re: Back On Topic! Re: [ot] paintball

RE: [SG] HAMR

From: "The Sutherlands" <nma@k...>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 07:50:46 +0900
Subject: RE: [SG] HAMR

How much signature would a cone rifle have?  I would think it would have
enough punch for anti-material work.  And since we are talking about
future
weapons we can assume they have worked out all the bugs by then.

That chuk Guy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of John Atkinson
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 3:28 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [SG] HAMR
>
>
>
> --- Laserlight <laserlight@quixnet.net> wrote:
> > Under the section on snipers, it mentions the Heavy
> > Anti Materiel
> > Rifle or HAMR.  What is this supposed to represent?
> > A .50 cal rifle,
> > or something bigger?
>
> I always presume so, considering that "anti-materiel
> rifle" is what .50 cal rifles are called.  Mostly
> because that's what they are used for since it's so
> much overkill it's ridiculous to shoot individuals
> with it.
>
> NRE has a 13mm Electrothermal-chemical rifle in that
> role.
>
> > Imapct 2d12 seems a lot for a .50 cal, but IIRC a
> > recoilless has a
> > large signature so wouldn't be appropriate for a
> > sniper.
>
> Yeah.
>
> John
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
> http://sports.yahoo.com/
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>


Prev: BULLSHIT, was RE: [SG] HAMR Next: Re: Back On Topic! Re: [ot] paintball