Re: Now on topic previously was Re: [OT]Nukes... tunnels.... boom....
From: Phillip Atcliffe <Phillip.Atcliffe@u...>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:09:56 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: Now on topic previously was Re: [OT]Nukes... tunnels.... boom....
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002 02:46:06 -0600 Don M <dmaddox1@hot.rr.com> wrote:
>> Which recalls to mind the way a certain board war-game, (NATO war
or some-such?) answered the "problem" of gaming nukes in tactical
combat.
>> (Rule number forgotten) If using optional Nuclear Battlefield
weapons, follow the following procedures:
>> 1. Set out mapboard.
>> 2. Defender sets out pieces.
>> 3. Attacker sets out pieces.
>> 4. Liberally apply lighter fluid to mapboard and pieces.
>> 5. Apply match.
>> 6. Stand by with fire extinguisher.
Yes, that was NATO, an old SPI game -- one of their first WWIII games,
a genre of which they were rather fond. But weren't those instructions
meant to "simulate" STRATEGIC nukes rather than tacnukes? Well, that's
what Murphy's Rules says, anyway... <g>
Phil
----
"Sic Transit Gloria Barramundi"
(Or, So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!)
-- not Douglas Adams, but me: Phil Atcliffe