Prev: Re: [OT]How to redefine the word "Unilaterally" Next: Re: [OT]Nukes... tunnels.... boom....

Re: [OT]How to redefine the word "Unilaterally"

From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:58:22 -0600
Subject: Re: [OT]How to redefine the word "Unilaterally"

On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:33:15 -0800 (PST), John Atkinson
<johnmatkinson@yahoo.com> wrote:

>The point still stands.  It's rare, difficult, done by
>2 states (one of which was loony-fascist at the time).

Oops... sent it too soon.

I was just listing what I came across. I should have put a preamble on
it,
stating that these were the military actions I found involving European
states.

And I missed the "successful" qualifier.

I should have also included a bunch of others that included US
participation,
just to be complete, including the involvement with the White Russians,
but
then again, that was unsuccessful, too.

Allan Goodall		       agoodall@hyperbear.com
http://www.hyperbear.com

"At long last, the earthy soil of the typical, 
unimaginable mortician was revealed!" 


Prev: Re: [OT]How to redefine the word "Unilaterally" Next: Re: [OT]Nukes... tunnels.... boom....