Prev: Re: [SG] (ish) Non-lethal anti-riot gel Next: Re: [SG] (ish) Non-lethal anti-riot gel

Re: [SG] (ish) Non-lethal anti-riot gel

From: Tony Francis <tony.francis@k...>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 16:26:49 +0000
Subject: Re: [SG] (ish) Non-lethal anti-riot gel

Germ wrote:
> 
> > You thought of it too Jeremey (or should I say Et tu Jeremey?)!
> > yup I think Cesear has some bigger suprises than the slighty
disapointing
> > performance of the Italian army in World War 2 (like the USA for
example,
> > who saw that one coming!).
> > Richard
> 
> Yes but at least we didn't post what we thought. Tony was too quick
off the
> mark.
> Mind you going by his other posts today I think he is getting close to
the
> 'crease'

Me ? I'm beyond 'creased' and well into 'severely crumpled'. 

-----------------------------
Tony Francis
Senior Software Engineer


Prev: Re: [SG] (ish) Non-lethal anti-riot gel Next: Re: [SG] (ish) Non-lethal anti-riot gel