Re: [SG] (ish) Non-lethal anti-riot gel

At 4:22 PM -0800 3/5/02, Brian Bilderback wrote:
>
>Their armored and artillery units fought
>>valiantly but without weaponry worth a half a tinker's
>>damn.  In some cases Italian artillery batteries fired
>>at British tanks until the tanks physically ran over
>>the pieces (the Brits lacked a decent HE round. . . ).
>
>An artillery piece incapable of killing a tank could be, when facing 
>tanks, considered non-lethal force.

Aye. And why waste ammo for your Besa or 2 pounder when you can just 
as easily run over the trails of their AT Guns and Artillery.

-- 
Ryan Gill			  rmgill@mindspring.com
	|	 |
	| O--=-  |	       |
	|_/|o|_\_|	       | _________
	/ 00DA61 \	       |/---------\
     _w/|=_[__]_= \w_	       // [_]  o[]\\
    |: O(4) ==	  O :|	      _Oo\=======/_O_
    |---\________/---|	      [__O_______W__]
     |~|\	 /|~|	      |~|/BSV 575\|~|
     |~|=\______/=|~|	      |~|=|_____|=|~|
     |~|	  |~|	      |~|	  |~|