RE: [OFFICIAL] NEW JAP SHIPS ONLINE!!!! :-)

Six specials that is not fleets!

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Paul Owen
Sent: 26 February 2002 23:46
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: [OFFICIAL] NEW JAP SHIPS ONLINE!!!! :-)

Yep the glitch has been caused by too long an entry in the description
field
and the extra stuff that has flowed over into other fields is causing
the
problem, shoudnt affect anything else, I will sort it in the morning,
thats
the trouble with trying to do three things at once!!

So far there have been 4 orders for the Jap mega fleet so even my adding
tells me there are six left. (i Think)

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Ground Zero
Games
Sent: 26 February 2002 22:58
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [OFFICIAL] NEW JAP SHIPS ONLINE!!!! :-)

>Happened to me also. maybe that means we're part of the lucky 10?
Whatever,
>I trust Jon and company to sort it out.

There's still a few of the first10 left, but I won't be downloading any
more till the morning now (it's late evening over here) - those that I
get
in tomorrow morning will be strictly taken in order of receipt according
to
time of sending, till the ten "extra-specials" are gone....

And yes, to repeat my earlier message - please don't worry about the
glitch
in the totals, you WON'T get charged wrongly - all the charging is done
manually, NOT by the software!

Jon (GZG)
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Roger Burton West" <roger@firedrake.org>
>To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:22 PM
>Subject: Re: [OFFICIAL] NEW JAP SHIPS ONLINE!!!! :-)
>
>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:18:42PM -0000, Robin Paul wrote:
>> >Jon, the online store gives the subtotal for 1 fleet as ?101- as I
would
>get
>> >killed if that showed up on my card, is it fixable?
>>
>> Same thing happened for me, but I've put in the order with an
>> appropriate comment (since the thing is human-moderated, thank
>> goodness).
>>
>> Roger