Re: SPS/Pulsars

On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:17:07AM -0500, Tomb wrote:
>RBW said:
>Who is going to put in beacons that will only be good
>after the signal gets across some large number of
>(light) years?

Actually that was Roger Books...

>Good point! So presumably for us to erect a meaningful beacon, we'll
>need
>some FTL system (maybe something that works on that mated pair of
>subatomic
>particles where a change in one is a change in another no matter how
far
>away,
>or something hyperspacial). 

If we had that we'd have FTL comms, which would change the shape of the
GZGverse very substantially.