Re: GPS + Pulsars + an apology/rebuttal
From: katie@f...
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:50:56 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: GPS + Pulsars + an apology/rebuttal
Quoting Roger Books <books@jumpspace.net>:
> On 23-Feb-02 at 11:29, Thomas Barclay (kaladorn@magma.ca) wrote:
> > Question:
> > Can we duplicate or fake a pulsar? If so, could
> > we mess up people's navigation? Could we
> > interfere with signals from a pulsar? Or cancel
> > them via some form of interference?
>
> Well, you could fake it if you want to go back into
> the past 50 years or so and beam your fake to where
> your opponents will be. :)
>
> > When establishing our own space beacons (SPS
> > - GPS in space), would we use some sort of
> > pulsar like signal, but with more uniqueness?
>
>
> Who is going to put in beacons that will only be good
> after the signal gets across some large number of
> (light) years?
Erm. Us?
We have sent out messages that are unlikely to be read inside the next
50,000
years. Sometimes people can be long-term about things...
> > You did not, in fairness, mention that the US can
> > also (you did build, and did pay for, and do
> > own - AFAIK - the constellation) turn off the
> > feeds from some satellites entirely or probably
> > even deactivate the whole shebang if it really
> > wants to black out an area.
>
> We would have to shut down commercial air traffic
> to do this. They are relying fairly heavily on
> it.
I don't know about in the US, but in Europe I was under the impression
that we