RE: Re: [FH] FTL, astronomy
From: Randall L Joiner <rljoiner@m...>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:50:11 -0500
Subject: RE: Re: [FH] FTL, astronomy
I'd have to say your Eiffel tower analogy is very flawed...
A simple, and modern, example is GPS. Something (relatively) far away,
and
used every day to predict where on earth (and near Solar system as
well!)
you are. I personally have used a GPS unit to determine where I'm
going,
where I've been, and where the hell I am right now. They're a
Hiking/Camper's dream! No more getting lost for 8 days in a mountain
range
for me, thank you very much. Not my fault, rockslides can happen at any
time, for any reason, and I happen to be _lucky_ it didn't happen when I
was crossing through the pass.
AFAIR, Pulsars have individually distinctive revolutions per time unit,
and
with over 700 known to us now, you could get a _very_ accurate position
from almost anywhere.
As to brightness of stars... How do you know star X is Sirius? What
distiguishes it from star Y? Brightness? That's like saying the light
in
front of house X is brighter than the light in front of house Y... It
does
depend on where you're at, but if I blind fold you, spin you around,
plunk
you down in a random point in a subdivision, how're you going to use
light
brightness to figure out where you are?
Rand.
At 02:59 PM 2/21/02 -0500, you wrote:
>John Leary wandered off topic:
>Navigation well most likey be done by using at least
>three known pulsars to determine location in space.
>Kind of like looking at 'lighthouses' in the stars.
>
>No pulsars close by, are there? I'd like we'd use nearby bright stars
eg
>Sirius--the closer they are, the easier it is to judge your exact
position.
>(If you're trying to get the right driveway, you might estimate from
the
>end of the block--not from the Eiffel Tower, as even though it stands
out
>well, it's a bit too far away).
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>mail2web - Check your email from the web at
>http://mail2web.com/ .