| Prev: Re: NUCLEAR POWERED AIRCRAFT | Next: Re: Stormtroopers |
Good.
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:03:48 EST ShldWulf@aol.com writes:
>
>--part1_16e.8f40183.29a01524_boundary
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>I seem to recall from an earlier study of the UN charter, (say about
>20 years
>ago I think :o) that the UN was specifically prohibited from having
>any
>integral military forces. The member states had to provide any, and
>the UN
>was basically stuck with what it got.
>
>Randy
>
>--part1_16e.8f40183.29a01524_boundary
>Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
><HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>I seem to recall from
>an earlier study of the UN charter, (say about 20 years ago I think
>:o) that the UN was specifically prohibited from having any integral
>military forces. The member states had to provide any, and the UN was
>basically stuck with what it got.
><BR>
><BR>Randy</FONT></HTML>
>
>--part1_16e.8f40183.29a01524_boundary--
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
| Prev: Re: NUCLEAR POWERED AIRCRAFT | Next: Re: Stormtroopers |