Prev: Re: [DS]Campaign Next: Re: [DS]Campaign

Re: Mercs as Peacekeepers

From: DAWGFACE47@w...
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:54:12 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: Mercs as Peacekeepers

BLUE HELMETS ON A COUPLE OF DIVISIONS AND MAKE THEM PERMENANT UNDER C
AND C PEACEKEEPERS-TO PAY OFF UN BILLS!

LOL-you better count the total number of US divisions available before
jus  assigning	a couple to fulltime UN duties!

LOL- i think that the  vast majority of US voters, as  well as US THE
SOLDIERS you are  volunteering might  needs be consulted here!

not too many soldiers i know  are happy about going to UN sponsored
crapholes  to be used as scarecrows and  walking targets.

better yet, why not allow active  duty	and qualified reservists of the
security council membership armed  forces to volunteer for tours of
duty with the  full time UN PEACEKEEPING FORCES? 

standardized enlistments,  ranks,  pay, privilages, housing, medical
/dental care retirement  benefits, logistical support and UN chain of
command.

a small UN  PEACEKEEPER FORCE (ground forces, airforces, and naval
forces) raised and payed for by the UN for duty as the military arm of
the UN security council would be fine with me.

UN PEACEKEEPING FORCES, due to size  restraints would only be deployed
where they were very necessary, not just at the hotspot of the moment as
defined  by politicians from various  countries WHO NEVER PUT THEIR OWN
ASSES ON THE LINE at the crisis spot!

the only military folks  serving under the UN banner would be volunteers
(FROM TOP TO BOTTOM OF THE  FORCE), and  not volunteers of some national
armed forces who  enlisted to serve their own country and have no desire
to serve the UN, or under a UN chain of  command. 

Prev: Re: [DS]Campaign Next: Re: [DS]Campaign