Prev: Re: Colourful Australian Lingo Next: RE: SNOW JOB

Re: Colourful Australian Lingo

From: "Brendan Pratt" <bastard@o...>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 11:27:35 +1100
Subject: Re: Colourful Australian Lingo

<snip>

> Back On Topic: All the population studies I've seen for the GZG-verse
colonies haven't taken into account any backflow - people who couldn't
hack
it (or more often, had more sense than to try).

Probably wouldn't be significant as the facility wouldn't exist for two
way
travel - it would most likely be too expensive and I really think that
colonists will mostly be in the "poor" category - why would significant
numbers of people leave a place where they were well off.

Brendan


Prev: Re: Colourful Australian Lingo Next: RE: SNOW JOB