Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Atkinson" <johnmatkinson@yahoo.com>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON

> 
> --- Ryan Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com> wrote:
> 
> > Likely folks are supposed to keep their M-4s. This
> > would replace the 
> > full M-4 set with the underslung M203.
> 
> No, it's supposed to replace the M-16.  The M-4 is not
> in use as the primary weapon except in SOF units.
>  
> > The difference is that it's supposed to be direct
> > fire. Rather than 
> > having to lob it in a high arc (ala a howitzer) you
> > aim direct at 
> > your target.
> 
> Assuming your laser, your computer, and your
> high-speed ninja electronics fuze all three work.
> 
> > Likely several guys peppering a BRDM, BTR or
> > anything else that is 
> > relatively light will mission kill it. Its also
> > likey to make the 
> > infantry really really want to debuss.
> 
> I don't want the infantry to debus.  I want it to stay
> in the back of it's track where I can kill the track
> and the whole squad with 1 well-placed AT-4.
> 
> John
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!