Re: small carrier expense

However in the 'ral virtual world' that I am using it *IS* the only
almost a capital ship (other then fancy BC wannabes) that any of the
local 'powers' have...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:36:31 -0800 Mark Reindl <mreindl@pacbell.net>
writes:
>
>
>> > >You're talking about expense a lot in the below message... take 
>that
>> > >thinking just a step or two further...
>> > >
>
>I don't know if it's been addressed yet, but another advantage to 
>building
>small carriers is the amount of time it takes vs. a larger vessel.  
>Also, loss
>of a smaller carrier isn't as crippling as a larger one would be, 
>either in
>terms of combat strength or morale.  In addition, there are some 
>things that
>smaller carriers are just better for when you don't want your big boys 
>tied up
>doing things like convoy escort, etc.
>
>Mark
>

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit: