Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON
From: "Brian Bilderback" <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:50:21 -0800
Subject: Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON
John Atkinson wrote:
>1)In real combat units[*] we use M-16s, with a handful
>of M-4s.
I am SO going to ID myself as a civvie here - what is the M-4?
In my current unit, it's PL, PSG, etc. In
>Germany we had more, so we issued them to vehicle
>crewmen as well. The M-4 is a carbine. It has a role
>as the weapon of people who have things to do in a
>firefight other than put rounds onto the enemy. Now
>they want to take away the M-16 entirely and replace
>it with a carbine with a high-tech grenade launcher
>that probably won't work anyway.
If it ain't fixed, it must be broken, right? The Gee Whiz syndrome
strikes
again.
>
> > Front like combat soldiers tend to have them. If
> > they had the ability
> > to handle light anti-armor rounds as well, they'd be
> > happier I think.
>
>Right. A 20mm low velocity grenade? That's going to
>kill what, a BRDM maybe?? Yipee. I'm just not
>enthused or convinced that it would represent a major
>improvement over a 40mm grenade.
Just from casual observation, I had a funny feeling that a REDUCTION of
launched grenade size was a BAD thing. I'm glad to see I'm not entirely
off
on that count.
> > Remember the whole reason of the OICW is that it
> > reduces the need for
> > other anti-armor rounds and gives a better ranged
> > grenade capability.
>
>You'll still need AT-4s to kill anything bigger than a
>BRDM. And I ain't worried about BRDMs because if the
>enemy's scouts aren't dead by the time I get to the
>fight, someone's done something deeply wrong.
Again, just my UNQUALIFIED observation, but it sounds from the
conversation
that the 20mm grenades are BARELY anti-armor capable. I apply this
concept
to the rest of life, it seems applicable to military issues as well -
just
BARELY being able to do something seems like a bad goal to set,
especially
since things always tend to get harder.
>John
>
>[*]Defined as: Units who's primary mission is to
>engage the enemy with small arms or who do so as an
>adjunct to performing their primary mission.
Shouldn't non-REAL-combat units get at least a SMATTERING of Combat
arms, in
case that "Something deeply wrong" happens?
2B^2
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: