Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:37:46 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: HIGH TECH WONDER INDIVIDUAL WEAPON
--- Ryan M Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com> wrote:
> section and use just the 5.56 unit. Also note, the
> whole OICW
> component is meant for those men in the squad that
> would be using the
> 40mm grenade component on their M4's anyhow.
1)In real combat units[*] we use M-16s, with a handful
of M-4s. In my current unit, it's PL, PSG, etc. In
Germany we had more, so we issued them to vehicle
crewmen as well. The M-4 is a carbine. It has a role
as the weapon of people who have things to do in a
firefight other than put rounds onto the enemy. Now
they want to take away the M-16 entirely and replace
it with a carbine with a high-tech grenade launcher
that probably won't work anyway.
> Front like combat soldiers tend to have them. If
> they had the ability
> to handle light anti-armor rounds as well, they'd be
> happier I think.
Right. A 20mm low velocity grenade? That's going to
kill what, a BRDM maybe?? Yipee. I'm just not
enthused or convinced that it would represent a major
improvement over a 40mm grenade.
> Remember the whole reason of the OICW is that it
> reduces the need for
> other anti-armor rounds and gives a better ranged
> grenade capability.
You'll still need AT-4s to kill anything bigger than a
BRDM. And I ain't worried about BRDMs because if the
enemy's scouts aren't dead by the time I get to the
fight, someone's done something deeply wrong.
John
[*]Defined as: Units who's primary mission is to
engage the enemy with small arms or who do so as an
adjunct to performing their primary mission.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!