Re: [FT] non-FTL Carrier

At 7:34 AM +0100 1/29/02, K.H.Ranitzsch wrote:
>Also a major power which has FTL carriers might have some non-FTL ones
for
>training, for testing new systems and procedures or for system defence.
They
>could also be old vessels whose FTL drive isn't worth repairing.

And likely many others. Given the amount of resources that go into 
supporting a terrestrial weter navy carrier, a small colony won't be 
given much good if in the form of a CVL even sans an FTL.

--
Ryan Gill	  |	   |	     rmgill@mindspring.com
		  |	   |
		  | O--=-  |
		  |_/|o|_\_|
		  / 00DA61 \
	       _w/|=_[__]_= \w_
	      |: O(4) ==    O :|
	      |---\________/---|
	       |‰|\	    /|‰|
	       |‰|=\______/=|‰|