Re: [FT] non-FTL Carrier
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 07:34:49 +0100
Subject: Re: [FT] non-FTL Carrier
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Gill" <rmgill@mindspring.com>
> Likely for a colony getting a third rate CVL with out FTL drive,
> they'd also have a load of advisors on how not to get yourself (or 50
> of your ship mates) killed when handling a fighter recovery.
Also a major power which has FTL carriers might have some non-FTL ones
for
training, for testing new systems and procedures or for system defence.
They
could also be old vessels whose FTL drive isn't worth repairing.
Greetings
Karl Heinz