Re: [semi-OT] black hawk down?
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:33:45 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [semi-OT] black hawk down?
--- Don Greenfield <gryphon@sisna.com> wrote:
> >The worst part was where the medic and an SSG were
> >working on a kid's severed artery.
>
> DYM Hollywood added this bit?
It's in the book.
> Reading the book now (only in the first chapter) but
> according to the
> author, the Rangers DID vary their routes and
> methods. Choppers out, land
> vehicles in; land vehicles out, choppers in;
> choppers or land vehicles both
> ways.
Inadequately so.
> Horrible timing, but they figured the prize was
> worth it. 20/20 says it
> was dumb, but if the Blackhawks don't go down and
> screw everything up,
> would it have caught Adid? Don't know.
They were going after some lieutenants of Aideed.
That's it.
> Oh, yeah. NCO's are supposed to be the snarling
> SOB's that make soldiers
> do what they're supposed to do, not what they want
> to do.
I've had both types and ones that make Joes do their
damn job are the only ones I respect.
> There was a CSAR team in case a chopper went down.
Yeah. Also known as Crash Site #2.
John
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!