Prev: Re: DS2: Design questions of my own. Next: Re: DS2: Design questions of my own.

Re: DS2: Design questions of my own.

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:29:07 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: DS2: Design questions of my own.


--- Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Jon Davis wrote:
> 
> >Actually, if you drop the PDS and backup systems
> and one
> >level of stealth and armor,
> 
> All unacceptable in CAF (Cascadian Armed Forces)
> doctrine.  They don't have 
> a lot of crews to spare, and definitely don't buy
> into "You can buy two for 
> one and afford to lose one", they'd prefer to
> increase individual vehicle 
> survivability.

Doubling your firepower doesn't increase your
casualties.  Doubling your firepower means you kill
the enemy in half the time which means he has half the
time to kill your guys.  Casualties are directly
proportional to amount of time spent under fire.  I'm
not saying to strip your defenses as much as some
people would say, but you have to balance things out.

> I'm tempted to ditch the RFAC and one APSW, and go
> with C4 with an MDC
> 5, free APSW, SPDS, and APFC.  But that drop in
> armor may be too much.  Even 
> a class 4 would be stealthed out in Cascadian
> designs.

I like that plan.  I'd never ditch the PDS--GMS/L
teams are too cheap to NOT buy as much PDS as you can
fit.

BTW, I'm sure you mentioned it, but what house rules
make you want an RFAC??

John

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/


Prev: Re: DS2: Design questions of my own. Next: Re: DS2: Design questions of my own.