Prev: Re: In A Perfect Game: SG/DS/RPG's - Experience Vs. Training Next: Re: In A Perfect Game: SG/DS/RPG's - Experience Vs. Training

RE: In A Perfect Game: SG/DS/RPG's - Experience Vs. Training

From: "David Rodemaker" <dar@h...>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:10:14 -0600
Subject: RE: In A Perfect Game: SG/DS/RPG's - Experience Vs. Training

I think it's actually 3, and yes it does.

David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Michael
Llaneza
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:11 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: In A Perfect Game: SG/DS/RPG's - Experience Vs. Training
> 
> 
> I think John's point was that the british units had been in almost 
> constant combat without losing morale.
> 
> Changing the subject, does anyone else get the cold shivers thinking 
> about India-Pakistan 2 happening Right Now of all times ?
> 
> WJAL21@aol.com wrote:
> 
> > In a message dated 28/12/01 22:34:21 GMT Standard Time, 
> > johnmatkinson@yahoo.com writes:
> >
> >
> >> Different case--due to the inadequacies of the
> >> training system, the low quality of the conscripts,
> >> the lack of adequate long-service NCOs, and a
> >> rotational system designed (apparently) to destroy the
> >> fighting soldier's morale, the US in Vietnam never had
> >> "experienced" troops or units in-country.	And still
> >> managed to never loose a fight.  The Brits had units
> >> which had been fighting almost continuously since
> >> 1940.
> >>
> >
> >
> >  I imagine that could drain anyone's fighting spirit.
> 
> 
> 


Prev: Re: In A Perfect Game: SG/DS/RPG's - Experience Vs. Training Next: Re: In A Perfect Game: SG/DS/RPG's - Experience Vs. Training