Prev: Re: [OT] Voting schemes Next: Re: Framework of nations

Re: Framework of nations

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 09:45:06 EST
Subject: Re: Framework of nations

Cannon Fodder, John, has it's place.

Gracias,
Glenn/Triphibious@juno.com
This is my Science Fiction Alter Ego E-mail address.
Historical - Warbeads@juno.com
Fantasy and 6mm - dwarf_warrior@juno.com

On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 06:31:30 -0800 (PST) John Atkinson
<johnmatkinson@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>--- Richard and Emily Bell <rlbell@sympatico.ca>
>wrote:
>
>> If the number of votes in the UN is determined by
>> the amount of funding that nations contribute, the
>> US would be demoted to observer status (but the US's
>> permanenent seat on the Security Council prevents
>> any disciplinary measures being taken against them
>> for failing to pay their
>> dues).
>
>I guess running the logistical support structures for
>every single peacekeeping mission doesn't count for
>much, does it?
>
>Oh, yeah.  And running _all_ of the enforcement
>missions (Korea, Iraq, Balkans) that the UN mandates
>but that the rest of the world combined doesn't have
>the balls or firepower to execute.
>
>The way the dues are split out is fundamentally unfair
>if you take into account the nations that do nothing
>but provide third-rate militia to the occasional
>peacekeeping mission. (Bangladesh et al).  
>
>John
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
>your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
>or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:


Prev: Re: [OT] Voting schemes Next: Re: Framework of nations