Re: [OT] Voting schemes
From: Roger Books <books@j...>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:29:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [OT] Voting schemes
On 14-Dec-01 at 09:22, Phillip Atcliffe (Phillip.Atcliffe@uwe.ac.uk)
wrote:
> > Instead of "one man, one vote", maybe it should be "one pound
> (dollar, whatever), one vote". <
>
> Ah, the Cynosure voting/funding scheme: money _is_ votes. The winning
> candidate is the one for whom the electorate pledges the most
financial
> support, and all "votes", including those for the loser(s), go to the
> Treasury.
>
> Of course, that was only for the low-to-medium-level bureaucracy; the
> _real_ rulers weren't voted in and weren't going to be voted out,
> either.
And I thought we had problems with campaign contributions from
special interest groups.