Prev: Re: Framework of nations WAS: Re: Attitude on the UN Next: Re: Framework of nations WAS: Re: Attitude on the UN

Re[2]: S'V Seekers

From: Flak Magnet <flakmagnet72@y...>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 19:27:24 -0500
Subject: Re[2]: S'V Seekers

Let's not forget that the pilots would need some serious resistance to
G-forces as well... unless FT has artificial gravity control built
into the fighters?

-- 
Best regards,
 Flak				
 Hive Fleet Jaegernaught
 http://www.geocites.com/flakmagnet72

Wednesday, December 12, 2001, 9:37:47 PM, Laserlight wrote:

>> >Concur.  If a fighter gets a secondary move, then an AI-controlled
>> >missile should too.  If anything, it should be more agile--not
L> limited
>> >by the pilot's ability to withstand maneuvering gees, and doesn't
L> have
>> >to haul around the life support system mass.
>> >
>>
>> YMMV - Depending on the PSB it may make sense but that ugly play
L> balance
>> issue has merit too.

L> I don't think I could say "missiles should be *less* agile than
L> fighters" with a straight face unless you start giving the fighter
L> jocks some serious psionic abilities.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?


Prev: Re: Framework of nations WAS: Re: Attitude on the UN Next: Re: Framework of nations WAS: Re: Attitude on the UN