Re: S'V Seekers

Oerjan Ohlson wrote:

> Considering that the current official rules for the MT missiles (which
> still are those in MT) make the VASTLY less maneuverable than
fighters, I
> don't think I agree with this argument.

Right. And I think the MT missile rules should allow them a secondary
movement and a 24mu move. It really doesn't make sense for them to move
slower then fighters.
 
> > >...and with that assured hit, these damage ideas are a bit on the
> > >excessive side. Consider that MT missiles are 2 MASS for their
effects.
> >
> >And Seekers require 1 mass and 1 energy (which is mass used there
where
> >it could be used somewhere else), same as a figher. Perhaps 2 energy
> >then?
> 
> Compare the cost of creating an SV "seeker" with the cost of creating
a
> single SV Drone.

Which is why they're now up to 2 biomass and sundry energy.